Views: 0 Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2026-02-10 Origin: Site
Two-shot (2K) injection molding creates superior products by combining two materials in a single cycle. But how does the mold physically make this happen? The secret lies in the mold’s movement. Here, we break down the three main 2K mold structures that make complex, bonded multi-material parts possible.
How it Works:
Imagine a mold core that spins like a carousel. This is the heart of the rotary mold. It's used with a specialized two-shot injection molding machine with a rotating platen.
The 4-Step Cycle:
First Shot (Material A): The mold closes in Position 1 and injects the first material (e.g., rigid plastic) to form the "substrate" part. The mold opens.
The Spin: The mold core, holding the substrate, rotates 180 degrees to Position 2. The part is now perfectly aligned with a different cavity.
Second Shot (Material B): The mold closes again. The second material (e.g., soft TPE) is injected into/around the substrate in the new cavity. Heat and pressure create a strong molecular bond at the interface.
Ejection & Reset: The finished, two-material part is ejected. The core rotates back to Position 1, and the cycle repeats.
Best For: High-volume production of parts requiring precision alignment, like tool handles, dual-color keys, toothbrushes, and overmolded electronics.
Pros:
High Precision & Consistency: Mechanical rotation ensures perfect alignment shot after shot.
Fast Cycle Times: Highly automated and efficient.
Design Flexibility: Ideal for most overmolding and multi-color applications.
Cons:
Higher Mold Cost: Requires complex rotating mechanisms and two core/cavity sets.
Dedicated Machine Needed: Must use a (more expensive) two-shot press with a rotating platen.
How it Works:
This mold doesn't spin. Instead, after the first shot, a specific core pin or insert physically retracts (like a drawer sliding shut) to create empty space for the second material. It often runs on a standard injection molding machine.
The 4-Step Cycle:
First Shot (Material A): The mold closes with all cores extended. Material A is injected to form a part with built-in voids or undercuts.
Core Retraction: The mold opens slightly, and an actuated core pin retracts horizontally or vertically from the A-part.
Second Shot (Material B): The mold closes again. Material B is injected into the cavity space left by the retracted core, flowing around the A-part to bond with it.
Ejection: The finished part is ejected, and the retractable core resets forward.
Best For: Parts where the second material needs to fully encapsulate a specific section or edge of the first material, like sealed gaskets, overmolded seals on connectors, or tool grips.
Pros:
Runs on Standard Machines: No need for a specialized two-shot press.
Good for Encapsulation: Excellent for creating tight, waterproof seals.
Mold Cost (Relatively): Can be lower than a rotary system for certain geometries.
Cons:
Design Complexity: Timing and sealing of the moving core are critical to prevent flash.
Limited Applications: Less ideal for side-by-side dual-color parts.
Potential Weak Points: May require holes or undercuts in the A-part for core movement.
How it Works:
This is a dramatic version of retraction. Here, the entire core (or a major section of it) moves backward over a large distance after the first shot, creating a much larger cavity for the second shot. It also typically uses a standard machine.
The 4-Step Cycle:
First Shot (Material A): The mold closes with the core in the forward position. Material A is injected, forming the initial substrate.
Major Core Movement: The mold opens, and the entire core is driven backward several centimeters or more by a large hydraulic cylinder.
Second Shot (Material B): The mold closes on the now-retracted core, creating a significantly larger cavity volume. Material B is injected, often forming the main body or a thick layer that encapsulates the A-part.
Ejection: The final part—much larger than the initial A-part—is ejected. The core resets to its forward position.
Best For: Large parts with significant differences in wall thickness between materials, or parts requiring a thick, soft outer layer over a rigid inner skeleton, like industrial handles, automotive panels with integrated seals, or thick-grip consumer products.
Pros:
Enables Unique Geometries: Allows for thick overmolds and major dimensional changes.
Superior Seal: Can create complete peripheral seals.
Uses Standard Machines: Operates on a conventional press with sufficient tonnage and stroke.
Cons:
Highest Complexity & Cost: The large-stroke actuation system is complex and expensive.
Longer Cycle Times: The core-back movement adds time to each cycle.
Potential for Defects: Requires precise control to avoid flow lines or sink marks in the thick B-material.
| Feature | Rotary Mold | Retractable Core Mold | Core-Back Mold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Key Movement | 180° Rotation | Local Core Retraction | Full Core Retraction |
| Machine Needed | Two-Shot Press | Standard Press | Standard Press (Heavy-Duty) |
| Mold Complexity | High | Medium-High | Highest |
| Typical Cost | High | Medium | Highest |
| Best Application | high-precision parts | Localized encapsulation/seals | Large parts, thick overmolds, full seals |
| Production Speed | Fastest | Medium | Medium-Slow |
For most projects seeking efficiency, precision, and volume, the Rotary Mold is the default champion.
If you have existing standard machines and your design involves a clear, localized overmold, explore the Retractable Core option.
Only consider the Core-Back Mold for specialized applications where material thickness varies greatly or a complete seal is the primary goal, and where cost and cycle time are secondary concerns.
Understanding these systems empowers you to have smarter conversations with your molding partner and select the right technology to bring your innovative multi-material product to life efficiently and reliably.
