Views: 0 Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2025-05-08 Origin: Site
Superior wear resistance – Ideal for abrasive plastics (e.g., glass-filled nylon, mineral-reinforced PP).
Better polishability – Required for optical-grade surfaces (e.g., lenses, light guides).
Longer mold life – Hardened steels (like S136 or powder metallurgy steels) can exceed 1 million cycles.
Increased brittleness – Prone to cracking in thin or complex mold sections.
Higher machining costs – Requires EDM or slow-speed milling, increasing production time.
Reduced thermal conductivity – Harder steels dissipate heat slower, potentially increasing cycle times.
Example:
A glass-filled PA66 mold made from HRC 60 powder steel lasts 3x longer than HRC 45 H13, but machining costs rise by 50%.
Materials:
Tool steels (e.g., S136, H13 with hardening)
Powder metallurgy steels (e.g., ASP60, Vanadis 10)
Best for:
Abrasive plastics (GF30%, mineral-filled polymers)
High-precision optical parts (lenses, light guides)
Materials:
Pre-hardened steels (e.g., P20, 718, NAK80)
H13 (heat-treated to HRC 48)
Best for:
General-purpose ABS, PP, PS molds (50K-500K cycles)
Molds with sliders/lifters (needs toughness)
Materials:
Aluminum (e.g., 7075, Alumold)
Beryllium copper (e.g., MoldMAX HH)
Best for:
Prototype molds (<100K cycles)
High-cooling-efficiency molds (e.g., LED housings)
Property | High Hardness Impact | Solution |
---|---|---|
Toughness | Decreases (risk of cracking) | Use tough core + hard surface (e.g., nitriding) |
Machinability | Slower, costlier machining | Use pre-hardened steels (e.g., P20) for simpler molds |
Thermal Conductivity | Lower (slower cooling) | Use beryllium copper inserts in hot zones |
Cost | 2-3x more expensive | Reserve high-hardness steels for critical areas only |
Nitriding – Adds a wear-resistant layer (HRC 65+) while keeping the core tough.
DLC Coating – Diamond-like carbon reduces friction, improving release.
Hard inserts (e.g., tungsten carbide in high-wear zones) + softer base (P20 or aluminum).
Case hardening creates a hard surface (HRC 55+) with a tough interior (HRC 35-40).
While high hardness improves wear resistance, it’s not always the best choice. Balance hardness with toughness, cooling efficiency, and cost based on:
Plastic type (abrasive? transparent?)
Mold complexity (thin walls? sliders?)
Production volume (prototype or mass production?)
For most applications, medium-hardness steels (HRC 35-48) offer the best compromise. Reserve ultra-hard materials (HRC 60+) only for extreme conditions.